this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
212 points (97.7% liked)

Games

31327 readers
791 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 128 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There is 0% chance this has happened by accident. Someone ordered the developers to program for them to appear there, and that's exactly how they ended up there

[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And even if it was a technical error such as extra code/functionality they decided to scrap but left in there at some point it was discussed and planned enough to be in there which is just as bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah I don't understand why they don't just own it. You're a company trying to maximize profits, and tried money grubbing your way to more. Then you got caught and your customers didn't like it. Admit it, move on to your next appallingly bad idea. Weak lies are the worst

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not defending Ubi here, they absolutely should have ripped this code out. They had to know the outrage that it would generate.

But it might not have been a management decision. It could have been a "20% time" project where a developer designed and implemented a system that they thought management would like, and then it never got ripped back out after it was rejected. Those projects are usually barebones and use existing assets as much as possible, so it wouldn't even mean that they had to stand up other systems to support it... They could just link to an existing ad from something else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That would imply they give a shit. Which they don't. If there's a chance they can squeeze 1€ extra out of their customers they will go for it, even if it enrages everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

A side project like that shouldn't be merged into the production code base.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

Yeah. What kind of idiotic accident would even cause this? That's specifically programmed functions to do exactly what it did. That's honestly a mind blowingly bad excuse to make.

Guess another reason on the pile of shit of why I continue to boycott this trash company.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 10 months ago (2 children)

whoops, one of our developers slipped on a banana peel and accidentally hit all the right keys, over the course of a couple of hours, to accidentally implement ads in the game

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

You see our intern was walking down the corridor with laptop in his hands after the meeting and he stumbled and accidentally coded in ads, designed format, shaders, online service for serving ads, database for storage and deployment scripts. What are the odds?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Ubisoft says it was trying to put an ad for Assassin’s Creed Mirage in the main menu of other Assassin’s Creed games. However, a “technical error” caused the promotion to show up on in-game menus instead.

There's nothing accidental (or "accidental") about the ad being in the game. Probably was an accident that it appeared mid-game, they need to desensitise you to ads in the menus first.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“We technically thought we would get away with this shit, which was an error. How pissed would you guys be about Coca Cola showing up in ancient Baghdad?”

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I misread the title at first as "Assassin's Greed".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly that should have just been the article title

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Assassin's Creed's Publisher's Greed: "No Pop-Ups. No Pop-Ups. You're The Pop-Ups."

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago

The system we set up to show ads accidentally showed ads.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Getting caught this time:

When they inevitably get caught doing it again:

The later, during the executive meeting:

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Joey is my spirit animal

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

"it's easier to apologise than it is to ask for permission".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

As in "We started a trial balloon, and your unfounded criticism made us take it back."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Rogue engineer strikes again.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Years back I was part of a focus group for VR and one of the questions they asked me was how accepting I would be of ads in game and well they got the most heated response from me with that one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Yeeaaah, don't think I'll be buying any ubi games again.