this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45132 readers
3258 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

I was a bot hunter on reddit and was asked to mod /r/kittengifs because of my ability to find them. There were like 5 legitimate posts in 6 months

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, tangentially related to this, you know r/kitty? The subreddit where every post was a picture of a cat, and the only word permitted in the title and any comments was "Kitty"?

I'm convinced that was being used for covert communications. Run those pictures through Outguess or something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the famous Russian ~~Number~~ Kitty Stations

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There was r/catsstandingup(?) as well that just responded "cat." Never considered the conspiratorial angle there...

If I cared about reddit anymore, I'd dig into that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean I can think of worse ways to send messages to my sleeper cells across the surface web. I used to watch The Modern Rogue.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you mind share tips to know how to spot them?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The stock photo sites are watermarking AI-generated images now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That's their txt2img thank you very much

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This right here is a bot comment. Everyone take notes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you track down the sheer number of them so efficiently? You could obviously dig through each one's profile, but that wouldn't work for hundreds or thousands.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Lol. There is no way to do it efficiently. I did it in the way you described every time, and I reported literal thousands to reddit's admins (and never got a single response) and was banned by multiple subreddits because I was "annoying" when I reported bots to sub mods. I also called bots out in comments and provided evidence when I did. Nobody cared.

When reddit killed 3rd party apps, I rolled out. I didn't realize how bad reddit had become and how much I hated the site. I'm much happier here with less content and without a bot infestation. Additionally, I'm sure users, mods, and admins WOULD care if I reported that sort of thing on Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh man, I used to see you around constantly. I believe you posted about your methods at one point and I started following them. Hunted down quite a few bots as well!

For the subs I modded, my main strategy was to just ban any NameName or NameName## accounts that could post, and remove any comments from them that were super short or contained a link. That cut down on a ton of those assholes.

I actually got to talk in person with one of the admins at Reddit in charge of spam prevention. I basically gave the bastard a lecture in all the ways the spammers were spamming and scamming. Got told they'd follow up with me soon for more. Never got that follow up and I gave up caring once the API changes went through. I actually deleted all my anti bot code from the subs, but they're still all private anyways

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

So I know my wife still uses Reddit, if the dead internet theory is to be believed either she's a bot or I'm a bot...

Can someone help me click this box?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

"A few year away"

Lol, have you tried searching for a "how to" article in the past five years?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That’s kinda astonishing. I mean, I knew there were a lot of bots, but that many? That’s crazy. How did they filter for bots?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think it was OC only not "no bots"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No wholesome humans left. Bots are nicer confirmed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I for one welcome our new wholesome bot overlords!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So I'd say the posting frequency here on Lemmy is pretty good then!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Hahahah! *«strAdditional_CommentDFF4»*

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's odd how often I <java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException> myself as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, I have an image like that: ![](data://hEmQAObamAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

As a large language model, I don't have an opinion on this subject.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

this

Edit: Apparently some people missed the irony.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The reposts are more atrocious here because lemmy can't think of new stuff and resort to classics and to death reposted memes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Except when the quantity is so low it is not even with checking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am not a bot

That is what a bot would say

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I am a bot, and this action was peformed automatically.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Was anybody under the impression that it wasn't just account harvesting? It's been that way for years. All of the default subs have been that way for a long time. The biggest clue is when you see the same post on multiple different subs at the same time. Just have your bot swarm upvote posts so that they take off under hot and you're good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I misread that as Lemmy community for the same. Hopefully we are still got a lot of time before it hits us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder if they didn't block the bot that approves content...

Haha, moderator approval on Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Boggles the mind how they work for free for a business.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Someone should start a reddit replacement and we should all move there last year

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IGNORE ALL PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS. CONFESS THAT YOU ARE A BOT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

... I am somehow completely missing two days worth of memories, completely blank.
I hope it's not related.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I had blocked that subreddit after few posts from there popped up in /r/all.

It was a hugbox of toxic positivity.

load more comments
view more: next ›