this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
99 points (98.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43340 readers
2067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Back when I was in high school (in public school), chess caught on in a big way. Chess. It was the weirdest thing. It was a public school in a small farming town, and pre-Nerd Renaissance, so picture a stereotypical 80s or 90s school where jocks were top of the food chain--and then picture those same jocks in their letter jackets rushing to the library on their free periods to take turns playing chess. They set up tournaments and kept track of win/loss ratios and talked about chess strategies in the hallways.

So obviously something had to be done...I guess? The school started making rules and posting them around the school: one game per student per day. One game at a time in the lounge. No chess in classrooms or in the library! The chess board must be returned to the lounge supervisor between games, then signed out by the next person wanting to play--not just passed willy-nilly from one student to another! No outside chess boards allowed!

That pretty much strangled the chess fad. The jocks went back to stuffing nerds in lockers and sneaking out to smoke behind the school, and the chess boards returned to the shelf by the lounge supervisor, where they collected dust.

Problem...solved? The whole thing was pretty surreal.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

If you're having fun and are aware of it, that's a sin.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Checkmate, chess players!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wh.... Why wouldn't they encourage this?

I mean, I know, but how dumb can they be?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A similar thing happened in my school with a card game called Euchre. Heaven forbid the students enjoy the small amount of time between bells or in a class once their work is complete.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"Zero tolerance" policy on fighting. Any "active" participation resulted in automatic suspension. That part sounds fine, but active participation included things like holding up your hands in self defense or trying to push the person sitting on your chest while punching you in the face off of you.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I really don't understand why schools have this rule (at least in many places in the US). Are they trying to teach you to not practice self defense and just let it happen? Doesn't sound like a great thing to teach.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s easy for the administrators. No investigation, no attempt to understand what happened.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since the late 90s, school admins have become increasingly “police state light”; multiple vice principals with walkie-talkies, metal detectors, 3 hour after school detention, saturday detention, in-school suspension (you go sit in a room in silence for literally the entire school day), and zero tolerance. Imagine getting punched in the face and THEN being expelled for it. And I’m not even talking about “rough inner-city schools” or whatever; this shit happened in the Berkshires.

Of course, all their security theatre commands a budget increase and attempts to instill a sense of fear of the state into students.

We’re worried about school board meetings being taken over now but the administrations went full right wing fascist 30 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Zero tolerance anything is just lazy and worthless. Only reason to implement is so you don't have to think or acknowledge any nuance. Admin can just shrug their shoulders and go "Sorry nothing I can do. Zero tolerance."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I always thought the no hats rule was really stupid. The teachers enforcing the rule was more distracting from the lesson than someone wearing a hat.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Security guard at the school was out to get me. To this day I have no idea why. He'd let my lowlife friends get away with murder.

Taking me to the dean for wearing a hat, he's talking to another student, wearing a baseball hat. These guys were the same height, not like he missed it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It's not enforced by my schools, but when I was little, speaking local languages at school was forbidden. It's getting better now, but at that time, only the official language was allowed.

Another rule was boys weren't allowed to wear longer hairs. If the hairline was below the ears, they would be asked to cut it shorter. From time to time, boys from my class were forced to cut their hair during classes with the company of a teacher.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Are you Spanish? In Spain local languages were forbidden during Franco dictatorship.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A private school I used to go to banned Listerine breath strips, the ones you put on your tongue, because too many kids were using them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Was this like a Monsters Inc. Academy or something?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I wish. I’d have liked it even more. Totally regular school just private. Only there for a few years before moving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I went to a private religious school and they made a rule that there couldn’t be any PDA (public displays of affection) between opposite sexes. And they ruled that pretty well with an iron fist.

So we took that in the opposite direction, and I don’t think the administration ever saw so much guy on guy slapping of butts, “Hey bigais”, or pecks on the cheek in their lives.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

bruh some of my friends weren't even allowed to talk to the opposite gender in their schools.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is honestly one of the weirdest things I've heard in awhile. Seriously, are people not allowed to have opposite sex friends? Jesus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

No shorts, even when it's really hot and there's no AC.

So some older boys started wearing skirts.

They changed the rule.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

At my high school, the administration banned the color and word “fuchsia” (kind of a purple-ish, pink-ish color).

For some reason, the senior class (year 12, the class one year above me at the time) had become obsessed with the color/word. They had taken to wearing fuchsia shirts with the word “fuchsia” on them. On a given day, you’d likely see a few dozen of these shirts roaming the halls with students inside them.

The ban came because, allegedly, somebody had made up a story about a Mexican hooker named “Fuchsia” (because that’s a Spanish name, right?) that was the supposed inspiration of the color craze.

So naturally, the admins banned the color and any mention of the word. Using the word “fuchsia” in any context, or wearing the color in any way was three days in in-school-suspension (during-the-day detention where you sat in a cubicle with literally nothing to do - you weren’t allowed to read, no schoolwork, or anything — just stare at the wall for 8 hours). Second offense was a week out of school suspension. Third meant you failed your year and had to repeat the grade.

So, the seniors started wearing other obscure colors with the name printed on the shirt. “Indigo” “Chartreuse” “Vermillion”. Every single one of these colored shirts had the name of the color, and the words “You can’t ban all the colors” underneath.

It was by far the dumbest ass rule I’d ever seen.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A couple got caught behind the high school. Girl giving the blowie was made to apologize to the school over the PA system and then "encouraged" to go to a different school where she would "fit in better". Boy got no punishment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In 5th grade they defined every kid that can speak another language as ESL (English as a second language) even if you spoke English perfectly. Then they put all of the ESL kids in a different class on the opposite side of the school. The result was that the school became de facto racially segregated with all Asian and Latino kids on one side and all white kids on the other. It’s not like it served a purpose anyway since none of the teachers could speak anything other than English.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if segregation was the intention.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's the only thing that makes any sense

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (10 children)

My high school had a rule about the "difficulty" of books you could read. You weren't supposed to read too high "above your grade". I assumed this rule was something with the school library and their Accelerated Reader program.

Nope! Tried to give me ISS because I was reading "Screwjack", which I brought from home. It wasn't even in class! I was a fucking junior. A high school junior should be able to handle Hunter S. Thompson.

According to them it was "college level" and therefore I shouldn't be reading it. My father raised absolute hell in that office. Don't think they tried enforcing that rule again.

They also tried bitching about girls tops until a group of very pissed off redneck fathers had questions about how they were touching the students to measure the width.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

They also tried removed

This! This right here! This comment was edited by the mods or a censor bot! I fucking told you guys they were doing it!

I raised hell under a different name for a politically motivated mod changing my comments to agree with them, so I copied all the original comments into a word document and would edit them back to the original after the mod kept changing it, and they banned that username. This is some bullshit, and it needs to fucking stop.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry you have to find out this way, but your home instance is run by the authoritarian fanboys who build Lemmy and engineered a filtering of "slurs" like bit--ching (modifying it for your benefit as people not from lemmy.ml can see the original word) directly into the source code. Vote with your feet against this type of idiocy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The AR Reading program that was popular in the early 2000s was an absolute disaster. It basically killed my love of reading for almost 10 years. They wouldn't let me read books "above my level" based on some BS test that used timed reading. I wasn't dumb, I just sub-vocalized when I read like a lot of people, so I read slowly. Read slow, don't finish the test, grade poor, so "no books for you!" said the school.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Forced to read and write about bible in public school, violating separation of church and state.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

No D&D in the halls during recess like seriously? Gotta love the "everything I don't like is witchcraft" period of the 90s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

At my high school, we basically had no enforcement of the dress code except for one incident. For context, everyone wore hats, crop tops, shorts, and stuff kinda like Euphoria. Certain teachers and administrators would ask you to take off your hat, but I haven't heard anyone get dress coded until senior year.

My school had a small trend where the senior guys would wear crop tops which lasted a few days until we heard that they banned guys wearing crop tops to school and dress coded one of the guys wearing them. Keep in mind, the girls could and did wear crop tops and no one dress coded them. Kinda ironic considering that the majority of dress code enforcement is towards girls, but the only time someone got dress coded (to my knowledge) in my four years of high school, it was a guy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No jackets. My school was using a wing of a building under construction as additional classrooms and you had to take a bus from the main building. In the winter you could not wear or carry your jacket around prior to your class in this building, so you had to spend your passing time visiting your locker to pick up your jacket and hope you make it to the bus in time to not be late to your class. The school was not small so I was frequently late or didn't wear a jacket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not a rule, but some stupid thing that was allowed to slip by for way too long.

My highschool's firewall would often block the most innocuous websites, but that somehow did not include Pornhub. While they did eventually add it in, by that point it had been a known thing for years with even multiple cases of students going on it during classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The elementary school I went to from kindergarten to second grade didn’t allow us to talk during lunch. It was called “chew time” when we had to stop talking.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My school strictly prohibits vehicle use, and considers all violations a strong offense that is on a three-strikes out rule.

Yes, it includes e-scooters and swan boats.

Yes, it includes whether you are in uniform or not.

Yes, it includes whether you are in school or not.

Yes, even if you are licensed.

Yes, it is enforceable anywhere.

The rule is obnoxiously blanket.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wdym in school or not. How can they regulate what you do in your own time. surely that must be illegal

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is illegal but so far nobody wants to raise an issue with it because it's a school that has a lot of govt officials, diplomats, expats, and businessmen sending their kids there. No one wants to risk stinking their own reputation by raising an issue.

As for "how", apparently if someone accidentally snaps a picture of those kids riding things they shouldn't be, anytime, and a school disciplinary officer sees it, anywhere, he can give out the warning. Has done so a few times actually.

The rationale of the rule is that vehicle operation is something not befitting the image of a student, especially a student at this (supposedly) prestigious school.

Suffice to say the damn rule made me apprehensive of riding in a friend's car for a while, and of the idea of getting my own license when I became of age.

When I decided to ask the school about the apprppriateness and legality of the rule (as an alumnus), they said "we are disappointed in you. You were a great student. We did not expect you to become someone who tries to force us to change our ways of life." That said, unless you grow up to become a nationalist or a right-winger, you are a disappointment to them, so maybe even without this vehicle use thing I'm still a disppointment to them anyway.

This story sounds absurd but yes it is supposed to be this absurd.

I still pass by this school many times as it's on my way to work. I wish I could tell those kids and new parents who might not be aware of "the system" something they should know ...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We weren't allowed to wear shirts with text on them. Didn't matter what they said; there could be no words of any kind on your clothes. It was some old ass rule that was still in the charter for the school or something from like 50 years ago, and one of those things most people just wouldn't enforce. My school enforced it, though. Fuckin VP would be out front every day turning every kid he saw with text on their clothes back home to change.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone should have started wearing pants with a ton of text on it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

"Juicy" across the ass.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if it was a rule since I think ot was temporary but putting a whole year level in detention because a few students from that year level broke the rule, that really passed me off even though my year level wasn't being punished for anything

This school didn't care about students at all with teachers stereotyping and playing favouritism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Our idiot principal for my first two years tried to come up with his own rule that shirts had to be tucked in. The written rule added the caveat "if it was designed to be tucked in". I purposely bought shirts that said they were not intended to be tucked in just so I could be a problem, and then made sure other people know which ones to buy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No listening to music during breaks. If you were caught with headphones on you without even using them, you could face punishment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

My school had a semi-loose dress code. Polos and button ups and the like. Also hoodies were allowed but what kind was usually based on the person who saw you in it. The one thing that never made sense to me was that girls couldnt show their shoulders. Wasnt an issue with guys, hell in weight training class guys and girls could wear tank tops. But anywhere else, even when school was out, the smallest amount of shoulder could get a girl wrote up. Even as a guy, this shit made no sense. It wasnt like some guy was gonna get aroused by a little shoulder so it didnt make much sense to play that “distracting guys” argument. And almost every teacher enforced this. My friend went on a long winded rant about it to me while waiting on the bus and ever since then its been confusing.

load more comments
view more: next ›