this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
749 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 184 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

And now they've just made the anti-democracy extremist Speaker of the House.

The GOP Speaker and presumptive nominee for President are both anti-American insurrectionists who want to tear down our democracy and institute single party rule. And the oligarch-owned media will absolutely shut up about it and pretend it's normal.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They’ve just made an anti-democratic Nationalist Christian extremist Speaker of the House - specificity is important.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

I feel like the word "the" in your first sentence is misleading. He most certainly is AN anti-democracy extremist, but by no means THE anti-democracy extremist. The Republican caucus is lousy with them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like it's time to hit the oligarchs where it hurts: them personally.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

The face, specifically

[–] [email protected] 120 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Republicans are children who want to lower taxes for the wealthy freeloading sociopathic thieves.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Republicans would veto a bill that banned abortion nationwide and provided free guns for the babies if it raised taxes on the rich by 0.1%.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

Free guns for the babies?? Get outta here with that commie shit, those lazy babies have to pull themselves by their bootstraps and get a second job to pay for their gun loans

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Vote republican! You'll be on the winning team and that's the full scope of our marketing tactic. Nothing else. Just "join us and be a winner".

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I'm hungry, let's go get something to eat"

"Cool how about tacos?"

"No, I don't want tacos."

"Okay, how about Thai food?"

"No, I don't want Thai food."

"Well what do you want to eat?"

"I don't know, you pick something."

Except policy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Picks something...

"This sucks! (upends table and food) I'm in charge of picking where we eat, now...it's your fault we're going hungry!"

Lather, rinse, repeat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

That's basically it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which is pretty weird considering many of them aren't wealthy and only stand to lose from such policies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

They buy into the stupid wealth worship. “They’re gonna take my billions, they’re gonna take your Pennies”

[–] [email protected] 112 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There's gonna be some really great attack ads running in swing districts next year. Every vulnerable moderate just got handcuffed to this guy. Now they can be accused of supporting all the most extreme, unpopular, and unlawful things in Johnson's record. And on top of that, this almost certainly means that the agenda moving forward will be dominated by things which would alienate moderates and independent voters.

Apparently the lackluster mid terms weren't enough of a wake up call. I wouldn’t be surprised if this turns out to be the moment that the Republicans lost the house. (Of course, I also wouldn’t be surprised to see the Democrats find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory)

[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago

And the way Trump was controlling the vote by endorsing candidates? The whole party is shackled to him, whether they admit it or not, and I hope the Democrats go HARD on that in the next election.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

If the Republican party ever becomes irrelevant, Democrats will be stuck waiting to find out what their new opposition party will be. If it winds up being an actual progressive party, I don't really see what options Democrats would be left with. Either they try to gain support from people leaving the Republican party, or they try to be "progressive enough" without losing corporate support?

If Democrats share that uncertainty about a post-Republican future, and if they think the way most status quo actors seem to, then I imagine they'd prefer the Republican party to hang on as long as possible.

What I think that strategy would look like: Democrats going as fiscally conservative as they can while still remaining left of Republicans. Democrats lamenting their inability to make progressive changes, all the while not investing much more than lip service towards advancing said progressive changes.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

The Democratic Party has shown very clearly that they would much rather lose to Republicans than allow their own platform to be dragged any more than just a tiny bit to the left.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Truth and facts are the enemy of the Republican Party.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 11 months ago

"Mike Johnson is Jim Jordan in a sports coat.”

— Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Viet Shelton, quoted by The Atlantic.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 11 months ago (1 children)

100% now they will hear it more and non-stop

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

They will hear this question whenever they present yet another insurrectionist speaker candidate. At least if the press in the US still has guts.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They've been emboldened since 2016

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

American Fascist Party. Yeah, I'm going to say it over and over.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No one can fault you for saying the truth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's the party that worships the constitution ordering the Press on what they can and cannot do

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, they're allowed to tell the press anything. I'm totally OK with that. I'm more upset by the fact they worship and swore to uphold the constitution and then tried to overthrow democracy, and now don't want to talk about it. Either it was a good thing and be proud of it and own it (it wasn't, but in their opinion...), or it was bad and a mistake and you should speak out about it and warn others not to make the same mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There you go thinking Republicans care about anything again. This is the party of power, nothing more. If they ever tell you they believe in something it's because you believing they believe in that something will get them more power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I do not wish harm upon some members of congress, but I will take pleasure in reading their obituaries.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

Wait, her name is Virginia Foxx? Bold to keep her stripper name when she transitioned into politics. I guess she was invested in the brand.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'll give him 7days as speaker. Any bets?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Will be outlast the lettuce?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Who is this geriatric cunt that yelled at that reporter to shut up lmao. In what world is that a reasonable response of she's coming from politics.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Fuck you, Virginia Foxx. Go join Diane Feinstein.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Damn. This final season of Handmaid's Tale getting a sneaker release as an Alternate Reality "Game" (or whatever this is) was sure an interesting production choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Where's the beef?

load more comments
view more: next ›