this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
132 points (94.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a test aimed at detecting dementia or cognitive decline, never included the combination of animals Trump identified this week

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Portsmouth, N.H., of the test, which he said involved a few animal identification queries. “They always show you the first one, like a giraffe, a tiger, or this, or that — a whale. ‘Which one is the whale?’ Okay. And that goes on for three or four [questions] and then it gets harder and harder and harder.”

They always show you the first one? Always? How many times has your doctor given you this cognitive test, Donny?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

They "always show him the first one," because he immediately fails every time he takes it.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If Trump started talking gibberish at one of his rallies, how would anyone know?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

He did a couple nights ago

Trump: We’re going to place strong protections to stop banks and regulators from trying to debank you from your— your political beliefs what they do. They want to debank you. We’re going to debank— think of this. They want to take away your country. Electric cars.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

I work with a guy like this that is in the C suite. Constantly just produces word salad and never finishes a thought, then everyone just looks around like yeah that made sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Nah, that just sounds like his normal incoherent self.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, he literally has for the past few years.

News sites have been calling it out and nobody cares.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I've actually found that your typical write-up in the NYT will take whatever word salad the actual speech was, and clean it up until Trump actually sounds like he had a point. A 5 minute ramble on North Korea will be turned into something like 'Mr Trump vowed to stand up to North Korean aggression' or whatever, basically just reading tea leaves. If you actually never saw video of him and went off what people wrote, you'd think he's just your average Republican.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like maybe Trump has dementia.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

People have been speculating that he does for years. His jerky movements while he's giving speeches, the fact he wears a back brace sometimes, the way he's had all of his most deranged/nonsensical tweets late in the evening, the way he leans on podiums as he speaks, even the way he went down a ramp very slowly one time a few years ago all point towards the type of degeneration indicative of dementia.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean it sounded off the cuff so I didnt think from his statement that he was actually give me the animals from memory. As much as I dont like old white guys in politics, this feels like a drummed up story to get haha points

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. From his statement, it sounds like he was giving a general example, not attempting to recall the specific animals he was shown. I say this as someone who thinks trump sounds like he is mentally unwell. Heck, this is downright coherent compared to a lot of the gibberish that comes out of his mouth.

“I think it was 35, 30 questions,” the former president said in Portsmouth, N.H., of the test, which he said involved a few animal identification queries. “They always show you the first one, like a giraffe, a tiger, or this, or that — a whale. ‘Which one is the whale?’ Okay. And that goes on for three or four [questions] and then it gets harder and harder and harder.”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I see your point, I also see the point of questioning how many times you take a dementia test before saying "they always show you" or before you wonder why you have to keep taking them. I suppose it is a good sign that he remembers he has taken multiple?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

It is, and this kind of thing is a big part of why Trump's cultists love him so much. Every time they see us all making fun of something like this, they feel like they're being attacked, like "liberal elitists" are looking down on their guy, and by extension on them, for no good reason. Instead of talking about how he's a dangerous authoritarian nationalist, a pompous rich man who despises his own voters, and a threat to the future of democracy, we look like a bunch of bullies forming a circle to point and laugh at the kid who doesn't test well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Big picture this doesn't matter because he's got his supporters and they're not gonna leave him. His supporters will follow him no matter what. Remember when he said he could walk out in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot someone and nothing would happen to him? He literally could shoot anyone and his supporters would cheer (extra cheering if that person is non-white or a liberal). They want Trump to be their president, king, emperor, and god. And he's already at least a couple of those things. If he wins this year, and he has an excellent chance, he will try to make himself king. Don't forget when President Xi of China made himself president for life, Trump said at a rally "maybe we should try that sometime" and attendees cheered.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What does he mean “It gets harder”? And no I’m not making a joke about sex.

How hard can it be for an adult (without dementia) to identify an fricken animal?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

It's not hard, here it is for anyone curious

There are some slightly different versions, though I'm not aware of any with a whale on it.

And it's a screening test for dementia, not some kind of iq test. Raging narcissist took this and decided he's the smartest person ever though.

Hardest question on there is the date imo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

English doctors used to ask who is the current Prime Minister, which obviously didn't work so well when the last-but-one Conservative PM lasted just a few weeks before getting replaced again

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

"Who is the prime minister?"

"A head of lettuce?"

"I pronounce him sane!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, I'm probably not gonna remember those words in five minutes...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You'd be surprised, it's really not that bad. And even if you've only remembered one but got everything else it's still a pass

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

He also talked about how long it was.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's hilarious to me that there is literally a possibility of two 80+ year olds challenging each other to a "who has less age-related cognitive decline" test. That's the hilarious part.

The sobering part is that the test would be related to deciding who gets to be President of the United States.

Buttigieg 2024.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you see Biden give a live speech or answer unscripted questions, it's clear that he's still sharp.

From what I can telll, the age fears about Biden are mostly a socially-acceptable way for people to express their fear that a black woman would become President if he died in office.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I watch him talk quite often. I watch all of his major addresses, listen to his interviews, etc. I'm not saying he's not "still sharp," my point is that even as you're trying to defend him, you have to use the phrase "still sharp."

I'm not concerned about who the VP is if POTUS dies in office. I'm concerned about, regardless of who the president and VP is, what will happen in this country if we have a VP assume the executive. If Trump is president and dies in office, it will be chaos. Same with Biden.

We are not a stable country right now. A US president dying in office is a MAJOR destabilizing event, even in the best of times.

We're really gambling by putting forward two candidates that actuarial tables indicate are more likely to die in office from all causes than basically any presidential candidates in American history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We've had eight Presidents die in office. The fact that there's a planned successor has meant that we have not had chaos as a result.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

The last president to die in office was assassinated, and it was 60 years ago. And, yes, it caused quite a bit of chaos.

Consider the idea that things might have changed in the last half century.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Buttigieg 2024.

Are you fucking joking? That ex-McKinsey piece of shit?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Ya haha. Just a joke no worries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

White house officially implements mandatory ciesta.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

I bet I would fucking ace this test